ethics.shoug-tech.com
ETHC project logo

ETHC303 Project · Working Doc

Group Paper: Task Split

10-page paper · 8-minute presentation
Target split ≈ 65–70 / 30–35

Division of Labor

Who writes what

Weighted by where the rubric puts its marks, not by section count. Shoug takes the sections that carry the most content weight; Layan's sections are shorter but no less necessary.

SA
Shoug
heaviest content sections + final assembly
  • Introduction1 pg
  • Literature Review incl. sustainability considerations2.5 pg
  • Analysis (largest section)2.5 pg
  • Recommendations (practical + sustainable)1 pg
  • Final editing, integration, plagiarism check, formattingN/A
L
Layan
shorter sections + sourcing
  • Abstract (written last)0.5 pg
  • Methodology0.5–1 pg
  • Conclusion + sustainability takeaway0.5 pg
  • References & APA formattingN/A
  • Sourcing scholarly references & images for the deckN/A

Estimated Page Distribution

10-page budget

References and formatting work aren't counted toward the page limit, so the bars below track only the written sections.

Introduction: Shoug1.0 pg
Literature Review: Shoug2.5 pg
Analysis: Shoug2.5 pg
Recommendations: Shoug1.0 pg
Abstract: Layan0.5 pg
Methodology: Layan0.5–1 pg
Conclusion: Layan0.5 pg
Shoug ≈ 7 pg Layan ≈ 2–3 pg + refs 10 pg total

Shared Delivery

Instructor-aligned presentation split

Introduce the topic briefly, move immediately to methodology, and then present the remaining analytical sections. The abstract and literature review stay in the supporting material rather than the live speaking route.

Instructor direction: introduce the topic, jump immediately to methodology, continue with the remaining paper sections, and plan for approximately eight minutes.

Speaking order: Opening 0:30 · Topic Introduction 1:00 · Methodology 1:15 · Findings and Analysis 3:15 · Recommendations 1:15 · Conclusion 0:45.

Shoug explains

  1. Opening and topic introduction · 1:30 total
  2. Ethical and societal findings within the shared analysis · about 2:00
  3. Recommendations · 1:15
  4. Hands over directly to Layan for methodology after the introduction

Layan explains

  1. Methodology immediately after the introduction · 1:15
  2. Sustainability findings, ethical theories, and key statistics · about 1:15
  3. Conclusion · 0:45
  4. Supports transitions and final questions

Sequence: order matters here

How the paper actually gets built

Each step depends on the one before it, so the order below is load-bearing, not just a checklist.

1

Shoug

Write the Introduction

Sets the paper's direction before anything else starts.

2

Layan

Collect 10–15 scholarly sources

IEEE, ACM, Springer, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar.

3

Shoug

Write Literature Review + Analysis

Built directly on the sources Layan gathered in step 2; folds in sustainability considerations alongside the ethical and social analysis.

4

Layan

Write Methodology

Frames the paper as a literature-based review using secondary sources.

5

Shoug

Write Recommendations

Follows from the Analysis findings; each recommendation is checked for practicality and long-term sustainability.

6

Layan

Write Conclusion

7

Layan

Write Abstract

Written last, once the full paper exists to summarize.

8

Shoug

Final merge, edit & consistency pass

Reads the whole draft as one voice; plagiarism check; formatting.

Why this split

Content-weighted, not section-count-weighted. Introduction, Literature Review, Analysis, and Recommendations carry most of the rubric's content marks and the paper's largest section (Analysis), so Shoug's share reflects that, not just a bigger slice for its own sake. Layan's sections (Abstract, Methodology, Conclusion, References) are shorter and more contained, which offsets a heavier workload elsewhere this term.